On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 01:13:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Considering that we're preserving this only for backwards compatibility,
> I doubt that changing the signature is a good idea. It maybe risks
> breaking something, and the ODBC driver is hardly going to notice
> any improved ease-of-use.
So, what you are basically saying is to switch currtid_byreloid() to
become a function local to tid.c. And then have just
currtid_byrelname() and currtid_for_view() call that, right?
--
Michael
