On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:31:24AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Can anyone tell me why the solution I proposed is not acceptable, and why we
> have to invent a different one instead? The website redirect is good and all,
> but doesn't really solve the problem, and I still don't know what's wrong with
> just fixing the docs...
Because at a certain point the number of _old_ names in the docs
obscures exactly how to operate the current software. We have tried
keeping stuff around, and we are very bad at removing stuff.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
