Re: Some doubious code in pgstat.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: Some doubious code in pgstat.c
Date
Msg-id 20201105.174334.2272293634355821223.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Some doubious code in pgstat.c  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Some doubious code in pgstat.c
Re: Some doubious code in pgstat.c
List pgsql-hackers
At Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:48:24 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote in 
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 9:44 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 11:18 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> > <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > As another issue, just replace memcpy with strlcpy makes compiler
> > > complain of type mismatch, as the first paramter to memcpy had an
> > > needless "&" operator. I removed it in this patch.
> > >
> > > (&msg.m_slotname is a "char (*)[NAMEDATALEN]", not a "char *".)
> > >
> >
> > The patch looks good to me.
> >
> 
> LGTM as well but the proposed commit message seems to be a bit
> unclear. How about something like this:
> "Use strlcpy instead of memcpy for copying the slot name in pgstat.c.
> 
> There is no outright bug here but it is better to be consistent with
> the usage at other places in the same file. In the passing, fix a wrong
> Assertion in pgstat_recv_replslot."

Looks better, thanks.

By the way, I noticed the following sequence.

pgstat.c: 3204
3204>    lbeentry.st_appname[0] = '\0';
3205>    if (MyProcPort && MyProcPort->remote_hostname)
3206>        strlcpy(lbeentry.st_clienthostname, MyProcPort->remote_hostname,
3207>                NAMEDATALEN);
3208>    else
3209>        lbeentry.st_clienthostname[0] = '\0';
3210>    lbeentry.st_activity_raw[0] = '\0';
3211>    /* Also make sure the last byte in each string area is always 0 */
3212>    lbeentry.st_appname[NAMEDATALEN - 1] = '\0';
3213>    lbeentry.st_clienthostname[NAMEDATALEN - 1] = '\0';
3214>    lbeentry.st_activity_raw[pgstat_track_activity_query_size - 1] = '\0';


The strlcpy at the line 3206 makes sure that st_clienthostname is
null-terminated so it's nonsense to do line 3213.  st_appname and
st_activity_raw are set to zero-length string.

Is there any point in setting terminating nul to them?

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Takashi Menjo
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Non-volatile WAL buffer
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries