EXPLAIN vs track_io_timing=on vs tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject EXPLAIN vs track_io_timing=on vs tests
Date
Msg-id 20201029231037.rkxo57ugnuchykpu@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: EXPLAIN vs track_io_timing=on vs tests
List pgsql-hackers
Hi

I run my development instances with track_io_timing=on, as I've found
that to be really useful. Unfortunately that causes tests to fail
whenever I forget to turn that off to run installcheck.

The diffs are caused by the additional data shown in the explain tests:
...
-       "Temp Written Blocks": N    +
+       "Temp Written Blocks": N,   +
+       "I/O Read Time": N.N,       +
+       "I/O Write Time": N.N       +
...


First, why is the output of these fields conditional when using a
non-text format?  Seems we instead should output -1 or null. The latter
seems a bit clearer, but is a bit json specific. I guess we could add a
ExplainPropertyNull() or such?

Second, as long as it is conditional, would anybody mind if I put a
track_io_timing=false into explain.sql? We don't try to make the tests
pass with every possible option set, but track_io_timing seems common
enough?

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: contrib/sslinfo cleanup and OpenSSL errorhandling
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Deleting older versions in unique indexes to avoid page splits