Re: Online checksums verification in the backend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Online checksums verification in the backend
Date
Msg-id 20201029183106.r5xkcws6zkwupip2@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Online checksums verification in the backend  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2020-10-29 11:17:29 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>         LWLockAcquire(BufferDescriptorGetIOLock(bufdesc), LW_SHARED);
>         buf_state = LockBufHdr(bufdesc);
>         UnlockBufHdr(bufdesc, buf_state);
> 
>         /* If the page is dirty or invalid, skip it */
>         if ((buf_state & BM_DIRTY) != 0 || (buf_state & BM_TAG_VALID) == 0)

This is weird as well. What is this supposed to do? Just locking and
unlocking a buffer header doesn't do squat? There's no guarantee that
the flags haven't changed by this point, so you could just as well not
acquire the buffer header lock.

Also, why are pages without a valid tag ignored? I can follow the
argument for skipping it in the DIRTY case, but that doesn't apply for
BM_TAG_VALID?

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Online checksums verification in the backend
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Online checksums verification in the backend