Re: CREATE TABLE .. PARTITION OF fails to preserve tgenabled for inherited row triggers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: CREATE TABLE .. PARTITION OF fails to preserve tgenabled for inherited row triggers
Date
Msg-id 20201020202001.GA6423@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CREATE TABLE .. PARTITION OF fails to preserve tgenabled for inherited row triggers  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: CREATE TABLE .. PARTITION OF fails to preserve tgenabled for inherited row triggers  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Oct-16, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> On 2020-Oct-16, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 
> > I also just noticed that ALTER TABLE ONLY recurses to children, which it
> > should not.
> 
> Apparently I wrote (bogus) bespoke code to handle recursion in
> EnableDisableTrigger instead of using ATSimpleRecursion.  This patch
> seems to fix this problem.

... but it affects legacy inheritance, which would be undesirable
because it has never recursed for that case.  So it needs to have a
relkind check here and only recurse if it's a new-style partitioned
table:

> diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
> index 511f015a86..c8d6f78da2 100644
> --- a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
> +++ b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
> @@ -4321,6 +4321,7 @@ ATPrepCmd(List **wqueue, Relation rel, AlterTableCmd *cmd,
>          case AT_DisableTrigAll:
>          case AT_DisableTrigUser:
>              ATSimplePermissions(rel, ATT_TABLE | ATT_FOREIGN_TABLE);
> +            ATSimpleRecursion(wqueue, rel, cmd, recurse, lockmode, context);
>              pass = AT_PASS_MISC;
>              break;
>          case AT_EnableRule:        /* ENABLE/DISABLE RULE variants */

I'll add tests for both cases and push to all branches 11+.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE TABLE .. PARTITION OF fails to preserve tgenabled for inherited row triggers
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Hash support for row types