At Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:32:10 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in
> At Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:56:02 +0800, "movead.li@highgo.ca" <movead.li@highgo.ca> wrote in
> > Thanks for all the suggestions.
> >
> > >Yeah. In its current shape, it means that only pg_waldump would be
> > >able to know this information. If you make this information part of
> > >xlogdesc.c, any consumer of the WAL record descriptions would be able
> > >to show this information, so it would provide a consistent output for
> > >any kind of tools.
> > I have change the implement, move some code into xlog_desc().
>
> Andres suggested that we don't need that description with per-record
> basis. Do you have a reason to do that? (For clarity, I'm not
> suggesting that you should reving it.)
Sorry. Maybe I deleted wrong letters in the "reving" above.
====
Andres suggested that we don't need that description with per-record
basis. Do you have a reason to do that? (For clarity, I'm not
suggesting that you should remove it.)
====
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
