Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt
Date
Msg-id 20200918224224.GD30016@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:40:30PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>     May be I am wrong, but it seems to me that not so much people know about
>     pgxn.org
>     Before writing this mail I have tried to locate such resource in Google and
>     didn't succeed.
> 
> yes, It is not strongly joined with the Postgres community, and it doesn't
> deploy binary (compiled) code if I know it. So for some people it is not
> usable.
> 
> But anytime this and similar repositories will have problems, because the
> extensions there are not reviewed, nobody did security check, nobody did QA.
> 
> This is useful for Postgres developers, for very advanced users, or for very
> fearless users :).

I think if PGXN had more must-have extensions, its popularity would
increase.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposals for making it easier to write correct bgworkers
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_service.conf file with iso-8859-1 parameters