On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 04:04:22PM +0200, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 12:50:12PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > >
> > > > Maybe this could be salvaged by flushing 0005 in its current form and
> > > > having the jsonb subscript executor do something like "if the current
> > > > value-to-be-subscripted is a JSON array, then try to convert the textual
> > > > subscript value to an integer". Not sure about what the error handling
> > > > rules ought to be like, though.
> > >
> > > I'm fine with the idea of separating 0005 patch and potentially prusuing
> > > it as an independent item. Just need to rebase 0006, since Pavel
> > > mentioned that it's a reasonable change he would like to see in the
> > > final result.
> >
> > +1
>
> Here is what I had in mind. Worth noting that, as well as the original
This seems to already hit a merge conflict (8febfd185).
Would you re-rebase ?
--
Justin
