Re: Autovacuum of independent tables - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: Autovacuum of independent tables
Date
Msg-id 20200909135928.GN29590@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Autovacuum of independent tables  (Michael Holzman <michaelholzman@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Greetings,

* Michael Holzman (michaelholzman@gmail.com) wrote:
> I have two applications A and B. A runs SELECT statements only and only on
> tableA. B actively updates tableB, A never looks into tableB. B has nothing
> to do with tableA.

In an ideal world, such distinct applications would probably do better
to live in independent PG clusters, which would address this issue with
VACUUM'ing and also allow you to do file-level backup/restore of each
independently, scale physical replicas independently, as well as manage
roles to be specific for each without seeing others, etc.

Thanks,

Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Brajendra Pratap Singh
Date:
Subject: Schema/ROLE Rename Issue
Next
From: Brajendra Pratap Singh
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema/ROLE Rename Issue