Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command
Date
Msg-id 20200907041310.GA3762@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 08:51:36AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Yeah, since I read this message, I was thinking that new patch will be
> posted. But, Josef, if the situation was changed, could you correct me?
> Anyway the patch seems not to be applied cleanly, so at least it needs to
> be updated to address that.

Josef, the patch has been waiting on author for a bit more than one
month, so could you send a rebased version please?  It looks that you
are still a bit confused by the commit fest process, and as a first
step we need a clean version to be able to review it.  This would also
allow the commit fest bot to check it at http://commitfest.cputube.org/.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: v13: CLUSTER segv with wal_level=minimal and parallel index creation