Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command
Date
Msg-id 722d83e1-6c1c-5f49-c8bb-0917079c4037@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 2020/07/29 3:30, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 
> 
> út 28. 7. 2020 v 20:25 odesílatel Josef Šimánek <josef.simanek@gmail.com <mailto:josef.simanek@gmail.com>> napsal:
> 
>     Thanks for the info. I am waiting for review. Is there any summary of requested changes needed?
> 
> 
> Maybe it is just noise - you wrote so you will resend a patch to different thread
> 
>> 
>>> I tried to reattach the thread there. I'll prepare a new patch soon, what should I do? Just attach it again?

Yeah, since I read this message, I was thinking that new patch will be
posted. But, Josef, if the situation was changed, could you correct me?
Anyway the patch seems not to be applied cleanly, so at least it needs to
be updated to address that.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing CFI in hlCover()?
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: HyperLogLog.c and pg_leftmost_one_pos32()