Re: "cert" + clientcert=verify-ca in pg_hba.conf? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: "cert" + clientcert=verify-ca in pg_hba.conf?
Date
Msg-id 20200902.104530.390400205987567977.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "cert" + clientcert=verify-ca in pg_hba.conf?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: "cert" + clientcert=verify-ca in pg_hba.conf?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello.

At Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:47:34 -0400, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote in 
> On Tue, Sep  1, 2020 at 01:59:25PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > At Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:34:29 -0400, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote in 
> > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 05:56:58PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > > > Ok, this is that. If we spcify clientcert=no-verify other than for
> > > > "cert" authentication, server complains as the following at startup.
> > > 
> > > Why does clientcert=no-verify have any value, even for a
> > > cert-authentication line?
> > > 
> > > > > LOG:  no-verify or 0 is the default setting that is discouraged to use explicitly for clientcert option
> > > > > HINT:  Consider removing the option instead. This option value is going to be deprecated in later version.
> > > > > CONTEXT:  line 90 of configuration file "/home/horiguti/data/data_noverify/pg_hba.conf"
> > > 
> > > I think it should just be removed in PG 14.  This is a configuration
> > > setting, not an SQL-level item that needs a deprecation period.
> > 
> > Ok, it is changed to just error out. I tempted to show a suggestion to
> > removing the option in that case like the following, but *didn't* in
> > this version of the patch.
> 
> OK, I have developed the attached patch based on yours.  I reordered the
> tests, simplified the documentation, and removed the hint since they

Looks good to me.

> will already get a good error message, and we will document this change

Oops! I thought I had removed that in the patch. Sorry for the mistake
and that also looks good to me.

> in the release notes.  It is also good you removed the 0/1 values for
> this, since that was also confusing.  We will put that removal in the
> release notes too.

Thank you for your assistance, Bruce!

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: 回复:how to create index concurrently on partitioned table
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: SyncRepLock acquired exclusively in default configuration