Hi,
On 2020-08-31 17:35:14 -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Em seg., 31 de ago. de 2020 às 17:05, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
> escreveu:
> > So it seems Rainier needs to turn this test off, because it actually is
> > intentional.
> >
> No problem.
> If intentional, the code at TransactionIdPrecedes, already knows that
> overflow can occur
> and trusts that the compiler will save it.
I don't know what you mean with "saving" it. Again, unsigned integer
overflow is well specified in C. All that's needed is for the compiler
to implement normal C.
