On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 07:28:02PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> This patch has carefully removed the ability to run the regression tests
> as a Windows administrative user, as I just discovered. This was the
> whole point of commit ce5d3424d6.
>
> I assume the testing referred to above was not as a privileged user. I
> think this should be reverted.
Thanks Andrew. This was discussed on the original thread and what I
wanted to do a rvert if you look at its newest history:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200623014036.GF50978@paquier.xyz
And then, the thread just stalled.. So I was not sure if something
was actually wanted or not.
Now, I don't think that just a simple revert is the best answer we can
provide. Just look at this comment in pg_regress.c that does not give
a hint that we actually should not remove this code:
- * On Windows only, clean out the test tablespace dir, or create it if it
- * doesn't exist. On other platforms we expect the Makefile to take care
- * of that. (We don't migrate that functionality in here because it'd be
- * harder to cope with platform-specific issues such as SELinux.)
- *
- * XXX it would be better if pg_regress.c had nothing at all to do with
- * testtablespace, and this were handled by a .BAT file or similar on
- * Windows. See pgsql-hackers discussion of 2008-01-18.
So instead I would like to propose the attached, reworking this
comment as follows (basically a revert, except for this comment):
+ /*
+ * On Windows only, clean out the test tablespace dir, or create it if it
+ * doesn't exist so as it is possible to run the regression tests as a
+ * Windows administrative user account with the restricted token obtained
+ * when starting pg_regress. On other platforms we expect the Makefile
+ * to take care of that.
+ */
What do you think?
--
Michael
