On 2020-Jul-08, David Steele wrote:
> On 7/8/20 4:39 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I think this phrasing in the original/updated version is pretty awkward:
>
> + A standby server that cannot be connected to until it is promoted to a
> + primary server is called a ...
Yeah.
> How about:
>
> + A standby server that must be promoted to a primary server before
> + accepting connections is called a ...
How about just reducing it to "A standby server that doesn't accept
connection is called a ..."? We don't really need to explain that if
you do promote the standby it will start accept connections -- do we?
It should be pretty obvious if you promote a standby, it will cease to
be a standby in the first place. This verbiage seems excessive.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
