Re: [Bug fix]There is the case archive_timeout parameter isignored after recovery works. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Kyotaro Horiguchi |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [Bug fix]There is the case archive_timeout parameter isignored after recovery works. |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20200629.164111.1368221830399585184.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | [Bug fix]There is the case archive_timeout parameter is ignored afterrecovery works. ("higuchi.daisuke@fujitsu.com" <higuchi.daisuke@fujitsu.com>) |
Responses |
Re: [Bug fix]There is the case archive_timeout parameter isignored after recovery works.
Re: [Bug fix]There is the case archive_timeout parameter is ignoredafter recovery works. RE: [Bug fix]There is the case archive_timeout parameter is ignoredafter recovery works. |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Hello. At Mon, 29 Jun 2020 04:35:11 +0000, "higuchi.daisuke@fujitsu.com" <higuchi.daisuke@fujitsu.com> wrote in > Hi, > > I found the bug about archive_timeout parameter. > There is the case archive_timeout parameter is ignored after recovery works. ... > [Problem] > When the value of archive_timeout is smaller than that of checkpoint_timeout and recovery works, archive_timeout is ignoredin the first WAL archiving. > Once WAL is archived, the archive_timeout seems to be valid after that. ... > Currently, cur_timeout is set according to only checkpoint_timeout when it is during recovery. > Even during recovery, the cur_timeout should be calculated including archive_timeout as well as checkpoint_timeout, I think. > I attached the patch to solve this problem. Unfortunately the diff command in your test script doesn't show me anything, but I can understand what you are thinking is a problem, maybe. But the patch doesn't seem the fix for the issue. Archiving works irrelevantly from that parameter. Completed WAL segments are immediately marked as ".ready" and archiver does its task immediately independently from checkpointer. The parameter, as described in documentation, forces the server to switch to a new WAL segment file periodically so that it can be archived, that is, it works only on primary. On the other hand on standby, a WAL segment is not marked as ".ready" until any data for the *next* segment comes. So the patch is not the fix for the issue. If primary switched segment and archived it but standby didn't archive the same immediately, you could force that by writing something on the master. Anyway, the attached patch would resolve your problem. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center From fec10780e132c1d284c66355c5215c284c16204d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyoga.ntt@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:12:01 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] Let complete segment archived immediately on standy walreceiver marks a completed segment as ".ready" after any data for the next segment comes. So standby can archive a WAL segment later than the primary archives the same segment. Let walreceiver archive a segment as soon as it is completed. --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 77 +++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index d1ad75da87..06c1e3cbe4 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -902,44 +902,10 @@ XLogWalRcvWrite(char *buf, Size nbytes, XLogRecPtr recptr) { int segbytes; - if (recvFile < 0 || !XLByteInSeg(recptr, recvSegNo, wal_segment_size)) + if (recvFile < 0) { bool use_existent; - /* - * fsync() and close current file before we switch to next one. We - * would otherwise have to reopen this file to fsync it later - */ - if (recvFile >= 0) - { - char xlogfname[MAXFNAMELEN]; - - XLogWalRcvFlush(false); - - XLogFileName(xlogfname, recvFileTLI, recvSegNo, wal_segment_size); - - /* - * XLOG segment files will be re-read by recovery in startup - * process soon, so we don't advise the OS to release cache - * pages associated with the file like XLogFileClose() does. - */ - if (close(recvFile) != 0) - ereport(PANIC, - (errcode_for_file_access(), - errmsg("could not close log segment %s: %m", - xlogfname))); - - /* - * Create .done file forcibly to prevent the streamed segment - * from being archived later. - */ - if (XLogArchiveMode != ARCHIVE_MODE_ALWAYS) - XLogArchiveForceDone(xlogfname); - else - XLogArchiveNotify(xlogfname); - } - recvFile = -1; - /* Create/use new log file */ XLByteToSeg(recptr, recvSegNo, wal_segment_size); use_existent = true; @@ -985,6 +951,47 @@ XLogWalRcvWrite(char *buf, Size nbytes, XLogRecPtr recptr) buf += byteswritten; LogstreamResult.Write = recptr; + + /* + * Close the current WAL segment if it is completed then let the file + * be archived if needed. + */ + if (!XLByteInSeg(recptr, recvSegNo, wal_segment_size)) + { + char xlogfname[MAXFNAMELEN]; + + Assert (recvFile >= 0); + + /* + * fsync() and close current file before we switch to next one. We + * would otherwise have to reopen this file to fsync it later + */ + XLogWalRcvFlush(false); + + XLogFileName(xlogfname, recvFileTLI, recvSegNo, wal_segment_size); + + /* + * XLOG segment files will be re-read by recovery in startup + * process soon, so we don't advise the OS to release cache + * pages associated with the file like XLogFileClose() does. + */ + if (close(recvFile) != 0) + ereport(PANIC, + (errcode_for_file_access(), + errmsg("could not close log segment %s: %m", + xlogfname))); + + /* + * Create .done file forcibly to prevent the streamed segment + * from being archived later. + */ + if (XLogArchiveMode != ARCHIVE_MODE_ALWAYS) + XLogArchiveForceDone(xlogfname); + else + XLogArchiveNotify(xlogfname); + + recvFile = -1; + } } /* Update shared-memory status */ -- 2.18.4
pgsql-hackers by date: