Re: should CREATE INDEX ON partitioned_table callPreventInTransactionBlock() ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: should CREATE INDEX ON partitioned_table callPreventInTransactionBlock() ?
Date
Msg-id 20200608162144.GA26108@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: should CREATE INDEX ON partitioned_table callPreventInTransactionBlock() ?  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Jun-08, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 11:27:26AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > Well, that would also require that transactions are committed and
> > started for each partition.  Merely adding PreventInTransactionBlock
> > would not do that.  Moreover, since this would break DDL-in-transactions
> > that would otherwise work, it should be optional and thus need a keyword
> > in the command.  But CONCURRENTLY isn't it (because that means something
> > else) so we'd have to discuss what it would be.
> 
> I wasn't thinking of a new feature but rather if it would be desirable to
> change behavior for v14 to always start/commit transaction for each partition.

Well, I was saying that I don't think a blanket behavior change is
desirable.  For example, if you have a script that creates a partitioned
table and a few partitions and a few indexes, and it does all that in a
transaction, it'll break.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Bump default wal_level to logical
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade fails with non-standard ACL