On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 12:36:34AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Should we think about adding automated detection of this type of
> mistake? I don't like the attached as-is because of the #include
> footprint expansion, but maybe we can find a better way.
I think that this one first boils down to the FRONTEND dependency in
those headers. Or in short, spin.h may get loaded by the frontend but
we have a backend-only API, no?
> It's actually worse in the back branches, because elog() did not have
> a good short-circuit path like ereport() does. +1 for back-patch.
Thanks, got that fixed down to 9.5.
--
Michael
