On 26/05/20, Frank Millman (frank@chagford.com) wrote:
> On 2020-05-26 2:11 PM, Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
> > No, we don't want to add any intelligence in trying to figure out what
> > is into a query. If you are comfortable that you will be using always
> > the same pattern for comments you can easily clean the string yourself
> > before passing it to psycopg.
> >
> > A better approach for you I guess would be to use named placeholders,
> > so that an a missing placeholder wouldn't require you to change the
> > arguments to execute.
> Ok, thanks.
>
> Frank
I must be missing something, because this works for me:
In [28]: d.query("""
...: select
...: 1 as a
...: /*
...: ,2 as b
...: */
...: -- ,'hi' as c
...: ,%s as d
...: """, ("a string", )).results
Out[28]: [Record(a=1, d='a string')]
(d.query is a wrapper around cursor_create, execute and fetchall).
Does using %s instead of {}.format help solve the issue?
