Re: Missing comma? - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Missing comma?
Date
Msg-id 20200514000738.GA166343@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing comma?  (Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: Missing comma?
List pgsql-docs
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 05:17:43PM +0300, Marina Polyakova wrote:
> in my opinion it's a little unclear what "or default" means at the end,
> because the comma is used to separate enumeration elements ("d = default
> <...>, n = nothing, f = all columns, i = index <...>") and inside the
> element description ("i = index with indisreplident set, or default").
> Therefore here is an additional patch from me to clarify this place, thanks
> to Alexander Lakhin for help.

Yes, I agree that this last "or default" in the docs does not make
much sense, because we always enforce REPLICA_IDENTITY_NOTHING if
there is no replica identity.

> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml
> index 02ddebae99d98110a8dd290dd4cb0c980adf7984..034a08f80ea4269f131e7e1383ba482fd76d9344 100644
> --- a/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml
> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml
> @@ -1936,7 +1936,7 @@ SCRAM-SHA-256$<replaceable><iteration count></replaceable>:<replaceable>&l
>         <literal>d</literal> = default (primary key, if any),
>         <literal>n</literal> = nothing,
>         <literal>f</literal> = all columns,
> -       <literal>i</literal> = index with <structfield>indisreplident</structfield> set, or default
> +       <literal>i</literal> = index with <structfield>indisreplident</structfield> set (if any)
>        </entry>
>       </row>

And you don't need the ("if any") either here, no?
REPLICA_IDENTITY_INDEX means that we have an index associated with the
replica identity so it seems to me that this last part can just be
removed.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: TLS docs fixes for
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: TLS docs fixes for