On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:07:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > I like your wording, but the "that encoding" wasn't clear enough for me,
> > so I reworded it to:
>
> > Allow Unicode escapes, e.g., E'\u####', U&'\####', to represent any
> > character available in the database encoding, even when the database
> > encoding is not UTF-8 (Tom Lane)
>
> How about "to be used for" instead of "to represent"? "Represent" kind
> of sounds like we're using these on output, which we aren't.
Uh, I think "used for" is worse though, since we are not using it. I
don't get the "output" feel of the word at all.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
