DETACH PARTITION and FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject DETACH PARTITION and FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id 20200408152412.GZ2228@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: DETACH PARTITION and FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables
List pgsql-hackers
This seems to be a bug in master, v12, and (probably) v11, where "FOR EACH FOR"
was first allowed on partition tables (86f575948).

I thought this would work like partitioned indexes (8b08f7d48), where detaching
a partition makes its index non-inherited, and attaching a partition marks a
pre-existing, matching partition as inherited rather than creating a new one.

DROP TABLE t, t1;
CREATE TABLE t(i int)PARTITION BY RANGE(i);
CREATE TABLE t1 PARTITION OF t FOR VALUES FROM(1)TO(2);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION trigf() RETURNS trigger LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $$ BEGIN END $$;
CREATE TRIGGER trig AFTER INSERT ON t FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE FUNCTION trigf();
SELECT tgrelid::regclass, * FROM pg_trigger WHERE tgrelid='t1'::regclass;
ALTER TABLE t DETACH PARTITION t1;
ALTER TABLE t ATTACH PARTITION t1 FOR VALUES FROM (1)TO(2);
ERROR:  trigger "trig" for relation "t1" already exists

DROP TRIGGER trig ON t1;
ERROR:  cannot drop trigger trig on table t1 because trigger trig on table t requires it
HINT:  You can drop trigger trig on table t instead.

I remember these, but they don't seem to be relevant to this issue, which seems
to be independant.

1fa846f1c9 Fix cloning of row triggers to sub-partitions
b9b408c487 Record parents of triggers

The commit for partitioned indexes talks about using an pre-existing index on
the child as a "convenience gadget", puts indexes into pg_inherit, and
introduces "ALTER INDEX..ATTACH PARTITION" and "CREATE INDEX..ON ONLY".

It's probably rare for a duplicate index to be useful (unless rebuilding to be
more optimal, which is probably not reasonably interspersed with altering
inheritence).  But I don't know if that's equally true for triggers.  So I'm
not sure what the intended behavior is, so I've stopped after implementing
a partial fix.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Conflict handling for COPY FROM
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort