Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI.
Date
Msg-id 20200407.102909.709448322643210522.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI.  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI.  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI.  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Thank you for picking this up.

At Tue, 7 Apr 2020 02:43:02 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote in 
> On 2020/03/19 22:22, Pavel Suderevsky wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've tested patch provided by Kyotaro and do confirm it fixes the
> > issue.
> 
> The patch looks good to me. Attached is the updated version of the
> patch.
> I updated only comments.

+             * The logfile segment that doesn't belong to the timeline is
+             * older or newer than the segment that the timeline started or
+             * eneded at, respectively. It's sufficient to check only the

s/eneded/ended/ ?

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Next
From: "movead.li@highgo.ca"
Date:
Subject: Re: A bug when use get_bit() function for a long bytea string