Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix
Date
Msg-id 20200318212511.GN26184@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix
Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:49:33PM +0100, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 06:18:31AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > See also:
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/27/2390/
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAOBaU_Yy5bt0vTPZ2_LUM6cUcGeqmYNoJ8-Rgto+c2+w3defYA@mail.gmail.com
> > b025f32e0b Add leader_pid to pg_stat_activity
> 
> FTR this is a followup of https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200315095728.GA26184%40telsasoft.com

Yes - but I wasn't going to draw attention to the first patch, in which I did
something needlessly complicated and indirect. :)

> +           case 'k':
> +               if (MyBackendType != B_BG_WORKER)
> +                   ; /* Do nothing */
> 
> 
> Isn't the test inverted?  Also a bgworker could run parallel queries through
> SPI I think, should we really ignore bgworkers?

I don't think it's reversed, but I think I see your point: the patch is
supposed to be showing the leader's own PID for the leader itself.  So I think
that can just be removed.

> +               else if (!MyProc->lockGroupLeader)
> +                   ; /* Do nothing */
> 
> There should be a test that MyProc isn't NULL.

Yes, done.

> +               else if (padding != 0)
> +                   appendStringInfo(buf, "%*d", padding, MyProc->lockGroupLeader->pid);
> +               else
> +                   appendStringInfo(buf, "%d", MyProc->lockGroupLeader->pid);
> +               break;
> 
> I think that if padding was asked we should append spaces rather than doing
> nothing.

Done

It logs like:

template1=# SET log_temp_files=0; explain analyze SELECT a,COUNT(1) FROM t a JOIN t b USING(a) GROUP BY 1;
2020-03-15 21:20:47.288 CDT [5537        5537]LOG:  statement: SET log_temp_files=0;
SET
2020-03-15 21:20:47.289 CDT [5537        5537]LOG:  statement: explain analyze SELECT a,COUNT(1) FROM t a JOIN t b
USING(a)GROUP BY 1;
 
2020-03-15 21:20:51.253 CDT [5627        5537]LOG:  temporary file: path "base/pgsql_tmp/pgsql_tmp5627.0", size
6094848
2020-03-15 21:20:51.253 CDT [5627        5537]STATEMENT:  explain analyze SELECT a,COUNT(1) FROM t a JOIN t b USING(a)
GROUPBY 1;
 
2020-03-15 21:20:51.254 CDT [5626        5537]LOG:  temporary file: path "base/pgsql_tmp/pgsql_tmp5626.0", size
6103040
2020-03-15 21:20:51.254 CDT [5626        5537]STATEMENT:  explain analyze SELECT a,COUNT(1) FROM t a JOIN t b USING(a)
GROUPBY 1;
 
2020-03-15 21:20:51.263 CDT [5537        5537]LOG:  temporary file: path
"base/pgsql_tmp/pgsql_tmp5537.1.sharedfileset/o15of16.p0.0",size 557056
 

Now, with the leader showing its own PID.

This also fixes unsafe access to lockGroupLeader->pid, same issue as in the
original v1 patch for b025f32e0b.

-- 
Justin

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Collation versioning
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: BEFORE ROW triggers for partitioned tables