Re: Online checksums verification in the backend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: Online checksums verification in the backend
Date
Msg-id 20200316131522.GA70971@nol
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Online checksums verification in the backend  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Online checksums verification in the backend  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 09:42:39AM +0100, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 01:53:35PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> >
> > In addition to comments from Michael-san, here are my comments:

Thanks both for the reviews.  I'm attaching a v3 with all comments addressed,
except:

> It seems to me that this test would be a good fit for
> src/test/modules/test_misc/.


AFAICT this is explicitly documented as tests for various extensions, and for
now it's a core function, so I didn't move it.


> +Run
> +    make check
> +or
> +    make installcheck
> Why is installcheck mentioned here?


This is actually already used in multiple other test readme.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: James Coleman
Date:
Subject: Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree