Re: Online checksums verification in the backend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: Online checksums verification in the backend
Date
Msg-id 20200316142932.GA51404@nol
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Online checksums verification in the backend  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 02:15:27PM +0100, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 09:42:39AM +0100, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 01:53:35PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > >
> > > In addition to comments from Michael-san, here are my comments:
>
> Thanks both for the reviews.  I'm attaching a v3 with all comments addressed,
> except:
>
> > It seems to me that this test would be a good fit for
> > src/test/modules/test_misc/.
>
>
> AFAICT this is explicitly documented as tests for various extensions, and for
> now it's a core function, so I didn't move it.
>
>
> > +Run
> > +    make check
> > +or
> > +    make installcheck
> > Why is installcheck mentioned here?
>
>
> This is actually already used in multiple other test readme.


Sorry I forgot to update the regression tests.  v4 attached.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use PKG_CHECK_MODULES to detect the libxml2 library