On 2020-03-10 12:27:25 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> That's true, but I have the same concern with Tom. The archive bacame
> too-tightly linked with other processes than actual relation.
What's the problem here? We have a number of helper processes
(checkpointer, bgwriter) that are attached to shared memory, and it's
not a problem.
> We may need the second static shared memory segment apart from the
> current one.
That seems absurd to me. Solving a non-problem by introducing complex
new infrastructure.
