Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11
Date
Msg-id 20200213184710.jjrkxavfmu2nktf4@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2020-02-13 13:40:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> ... and pushed.  One other change I made beyond those suggested
> was to push the zero-divide ereport's out-of-line as well.

Thanks!


> I did not do anything about adding unlikely() calls around the
> unrelated isinf tests in float.c.  That seemed to me to be a separate
> matter, and I'm not quite convinced it'd be a win anyway.

I was mostly going for consistency...

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11
Next
From: legrand legrand
Date:
Subject: Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance