On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:28:05AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> I think it is reasonable.
Indeed, that makes sense to me as well. I am adding Peter Eisentraut
in CC as the author/committer of 8a3d942 to comment on that.
> By the way, I'm not sure the criteria of setting a GUC variable as
> GUC_SUPERUSER_ONLY, but for example, ssl_max/min_protocol_version,
> dynamic_library_path, log_directory, krb_server_keyfile,
> data_directory and config_file are GUC_SUPERUSER_ONLY. So, it seems to
> me very strange that ssl_*_file are not. Don't we need to mark them
> maybe and some of the other ssl_* as the same?
This should be a separate discussion IMO. Perhaps there is a point in
softening or hardening some of them.
--
Michael
