On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 01:06:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I still agree with Robert that a052f6c is a bad idea. It's not the case
> that that's blocking "any connected user" from causing an issue. The
> temp schemas are always owned by the bootstrap superuser, so only a
> superuser could delete them. All that that patch is doing is preventing
> superusers from doing something that they could reasonably wish to do,
> and that is perfectly safe when there's not concurrent usage of the
> schema. We are not normally that nanny-ish, and the case for being so
> here seems pretty thin.
Okay, I am running out of arguments then, so attached is a patch to
address things. I would also prefer if we keep the relation name in
the log even if the namespace is missing.
--
Michael
