On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:04:21 +0100
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> I fixed almost all mentioned issues (that I understand)
If you don't understand you might ask, or at least say.
That way I know you've noticed my remarks and I don't
have to repeat them.
I have 2 remaining suggestions.
1) As previously suggested: Consider moving
all the code you added to numeric.c to right after
the scale() related code. This is equivalent to
what was done in pg_proc.dat and regression tests
where all the scale related stuff is in one
place in the file.
2) Now that the function is called min_scale()
it might be nice if your "minscale" variable
in numeric.c was named "min_scale".
I don't feel particularly strongly about either
of the above but think them a slight improvement.
I also wonder whether all the trim_scale() tests
are now necessary, but not enough to make any suggestions.
Especially because, well, tests are good.
Regards,
Karl <kop@meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
