At Mon, 11 Nov 2019 10:03:14 +0100, Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote in
> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> > Does something like the attached patch make sense? Reviews are
> > welcome.
>
> This looks good to me.
I have a qustion.
The current code assumes that !BM_DIRTY means that the function is
dirtying the page. But if !BM_JUST_DIRTIED, the function actually is
going to re-dirty the page even if BM_DIRTY.
If this is correct, the trigger for stats update is not !BM_DIRTY but
!BM_JUST_DIRTIED, or the fact that we passed the line of
XLogSaveBufferForHint() could be the trigger, regardless whether the
LSN is valid or not.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
