On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:52:39AM +0200, Tom Lane wrote:
> Morris de Oryx <morrisdeoryx@gmail.com> writes:
> > Given that Amazon is bragging this week about turning off Oracle, it seems
> > like they could kick some resources towards contributing something to the
> > Postgres project. With that in mind, is the idea of defining dictionaries
> > within a table somehow meritless, or unexpectedly difficult?
>
> Well, it'd just be totally different. I don't think anybody cares to
> provide two separate definitions of common dictionaries (which'd have to
> somehow be kept in sync).
Might crafty use of server side
COPY TO ... PROGRAM ...
enable OP to drop in dictionary data files as needed ?
Karsten
--
GPG 40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6 5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B
