On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 04:22:15PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:19:38PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 05:16:19PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> On 2019-Sep-26, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> Well, right now, pg_upgrade --check succeeds, but the upgrade fails. I
> >>> am proposing, at a minimum, that pg_upgrade --check fails in such cases,
> >>
> >> Agreed, that should be a minimum fix.
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Agreed as well here. At least the latest patch proposed has the merit
> to track automatically functions not existing anymore from the
> source's version to the target's version, so patching --check offers a
> good compromise. Bruce, are you planning to look more at the patch
> posted at [1]?
I did look at it. It has some TODO items listed in it still, and some
C++ comments, but if everyone likes it I can apply it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
