Re: BUG #15964: vacuumdb.c:187:10: error: use of undeclaredidentifier 'FD_SETSIZE' - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: BUG #15964: vacuumdb.c:187:10: error: use of undeclaredidentifier 'FD_SETSIZE'
Date
Msg-id 20190819025953.GA15110@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #15964: vacuumdb.c:187:10: error: use of undeclaredidentifier 'FD_SETSIZE'  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: BUG #15964: vacuumdb.c:187:10: error: use of undeclaredidentifier 'FD_SETSIZE'
List pgsql-bugs
On 2019-Aug-17, Andres Freund wrote:

> Hm. This made me think: Why is
> 
>                 if (concurrentCons > FD_SETSIZE - 1)
>                 {
>                     pg_log_error("too many parallel jobs requested (maximum: %d)",
>                                  FD_SETSIZE - 1);
> 
> a useful test / error message?  FD_SETSIZE is about the numerical value
> of fds.  There will usually be at least three fds open, starting at 0 -
> but there easily can be more, depending on what the reindexdb/vacuumdb
> caller is doing.

Hmm ... yeah, this is clearly not perfect.  In my laptop, vacuumdb -j 1021
works; 1022 and 1023 fail like this after opening a number of conns:

vacuumdb: vacuuming database "alvherre"
vacuumdb: error: could not connect to database alvherre: could not look up local user ID 1000: Too many open files

and 1024 fails like this immediately on start:
vacuumdb: error: too many parallel jobs requested (maximum: 1023)

After 'ulimit -n 1200', vacuumdb -j1023 fails like this:

vacuumdb: vacuuming database "alvherre"
*** buffer overflow detected ***: vacuumdb terminated
Aborted

So I agree that we need a fix.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple inheritance and ALTER TABLE issue
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15964: vacuumdb.c:187:10: error: use of undeclaredidentifier 'FD_SETSIZE'