Re: Grouping isolationtester tests in the schedule - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Grouping isolationtester tests in the schedule
Date
Msg-id 20190807155241.GA2733@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Grouping isolationtester tests in the schedule  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Grouping isolationtester tests in the schedule  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Aug-07, Tom Lane wrote:

> Something related I've been wondering about is whether we could
> parallelize the isolation tests.  A difficulty here is that the
> slowest ones tend to also be timing-sensitive, such that running
> them in parallel would increase the risk of failure.  But we
> could likely get at least some improvement.

Yeah, there's some improvement to be had there.  We've discussed it
previously:
https://postgr.es/m/20180124231006.z7spaz5gkzbdvob5@alvherre.pgsql

I'm not really happy about this grouping if we mean we're restricted in
how we can make tests run in parallel.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: s/rewinded/rewound/?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: s/rewinded/rewound/?