Re: incorrect xlog.c coverage report - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: incorrect xlog.c coverage report
Date
Msg-id 20190530221515.GO2848@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: incorrect xlog.c coverage report  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: incorrect xlog.c coverage report  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 12:09:08PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Are there objections to doing that now on the master branch?

Adding the flush call just on HEAD is fine for me.  Not sure that
there is an actual reason to back-patch that.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: cpluspluscheck vs vpath
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: How to know referenced sub-fields of a composite type?