Hi Andrew,
On 2019-03-30 16:42:16 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On some machines (*cough* Mingw *cough*) installs are very slow. We've
> ameliorated this by allowing temp installs to be reused, but the
> pg_upgrade Makefile never got the message. Here's a patch that does
> that. I'd like to backpatch it, at least to 9.5 where we switched the
> pg_upgrade location. The risk seems appropriately low and it only
> affects our test regime.
I'm confused as to why this was done as a purely optional path, rather
than just ripping out the pg_upgrade specific install?
See also discussion around https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/21766.1558397960%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Greetings,
Andres Freund
