Hi,
On 2019-05-15 11:05:31 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> After eyeballing the giant patch set you sent[1], I think EXEC is a
> horrible keyword to use -- IMO it should either be the complete word
> EXECUTE, or we should pick some other word. I realize that we do not
> want to have different sets of keywords when using the legacy syntax (no
> parens) vs. new-style (with parens), but maybe we should just not
> support the EXECUTE keyword in the legacy syntax; there's already a
> number of options we don't support in the legacy syntax (BUFFERS,
> TIMING), so this isn't much of a stretch.
That seems too confusing.
> [1] I think if you just leave out the GUC print from the changes, it
> becomes a reasonable patch series.
Yea, it really should be small incremental changes instead of proposals
to "just change everything".
Greetings,
Andres Freund
