On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 08:08:05AM +0200, Chris Travers wrote:
> Having thought about this a bit, I think the best solution would be to have
> grant take out an access share lock to the tables granted. This would
> prevent concurrent alter table operations from altering the schema
> underneath the grant as well, and thus possibly cause other race conditions.
>
> Any thoughts?
"tuple concurrently updated" is an error message which should never be
user-facing, and unfortunately there are many scenarios where it can
be triggered by playing with concurrent DDLs:
https://postgr.es/m/20171228063004.GB6181@paquier.xyz
If you have an idea of patch, could you write it? Having an isolation
test case would be nice as well.
--
Michael
