On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:10:18AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> That's a hard morning... Yes you are right and I can see the failure.
> By the way, grouping everything in one patch looks more adapted to me
> as this tightens all the checks for the different verifier types.
The afternoon has been better. I have double-checked your patch and
committed it down to v10. Now, there are two things which may need
extra handling:
- Do we add a note in the release notes about that with a SQL query
checking the state of pg_authid?
- In ~9.6 we include in md5.h a macro which does not care about hex
characters in the MD5 hash. I think that we should fix that as well,
or perhaps that's not worth caring per the lack of complaints?
Attached is what would be needed.
--
Michael
