Re: Commit(?) overhead - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Commit(?) overhead
Date
Msg-id 20190409222336.45ekgwcj4ot3zxkq@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commit(?) overhead  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Responses Re: Commit(?) overhead  (Duncan Kinnear <duncan.kinnear@mccarthy.co.nz>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi,

On 2019-04-09 17:12:27 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> You could test that's the issue by comparing with fsync=off (please read what
> that means and don't run your production cluster like that).
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-wal.html#GUC-FSYNC

I suggest testing it with synchronous_commit=off instead. That's about
as fast for this type of workload, doesn't have cluster corruption
issues, the window of a transaction not persisting in case of a crash is
very small, and it can just set by any user in individual sessions.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Commit(?) overhead
Next
From: Duncan Kinnear
Date:
Subject: Re: Commit(?) overhead