Hello.
At Fri, 15 Mar 2019 17:30:07 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote in
<20190315.173007.147577546.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> The patch relies on the fact(?) that the lowest index is always
> -1 in range partition and uses it as pseudo default
> partition. I'm not sure it is really the fact and anyway it
> donsn't seem the right thing to do. Could you explain how it
> works, not what you did in this patch?
I understood how it works but still uneasy that only list
partitioning requires scan_default. Anyway please ignore this.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
