Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case
Date
Msg-id 20190204050532.GJ29064@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 04:44:37PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> Thanks for the review. Just for the records, patch still has no conflicts and
> pass all the tests. Yura, do you have any plans about this patch, could you
> respond to the feedback? In the meantime I'm moving it to the next CF.

No answers since the latest review, so I am marking the patch as
returned with feedback.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Reduce amount of WAL generated by CREATE INDEX for gist, gin andsp-gist
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement