Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dmitry Dolgov
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case
Date
Msg-id CA+q6zcV3RUDDL9_8AgWhEzB8z5YPq7pHH=tQxsPMyJ4kLXhKuA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 5:19 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The idea of this patch seems reasonable.
>
> I've looked at this patch. This patch still can be applied cleanly to
> the current HEAD and passed regression tests.
>
> Here is review comments.

Thanks for the review. Just for the records, patch still has no conflicts and
pass all the tests. Yura, do you have any plans about this patch, could you
respond to the feedback? In the meantime I'm moving it to the next CF.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2
Next
From: ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker)
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve tab completion for CREATE TABLE