Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
Date
Msg-id 20190204051053.GK29064@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 02:17:49PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> It means to write own lexer and preparse source code before I start
> checking.
>
> I think so block level PRAGMA is significantly better solution

Please note that the latest patch is failing to apply, so I have moved
the patch to next CF, waiting on author.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Support for Secure Transport SSL library on macOS asOpenSSL alternative