On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 09:11:50AM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> Jamison, Kirk wrote:
>> I wonder if there is a better reloption name for
>> shrink_enabled. (truncate_enabled, vacuum_enabled? Hmm. No?)
>> On the other hand, shrink_enabled seems to describe well what it's
>> supposed to do when vacuuming tables. Besides there's a
>> similarly-named autovacuum_enabled option.
>
> I like "shrink_enabled".
>
> It may sound weird in the ears of PostgreSQL hackers, but will make
> sense to users.
>
> Perhaps "vacuum_shrink_enabled" would be even better.
Naming it just vacuum_truncate and autovacuum_truncate (with aliases
for toast and such), looks more natural to me. "shrink" is not a term
used in the code at all to describe this phase of vacuuming, and this
option talks mainly to people who are experts in PostgreSQL internals
in my opinion.
--
Michael
