Re: removal of dangling temp tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: removal of dangling temp tables
Date
Msg-id 20181228044314.GG3210@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: removal of dangling temp tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: removal of dangling temp tables
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 12:05:34AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> The server code allocates arrays, but that's fine because that code is
> recompiled.  Extensions only pass pointers around -- they don't create
> any additional arrays.

There are many exotic extensions which could be using sizeof(PGPROC)
as that's a popular structure, so I am glad that 246a6c8f did not find
its way down.  So thanks for what you have done!
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: add_partial_path() may remove dominated path but still in use
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Compiling on Termux