On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:52:09AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Hmm, note that we don't pass CopyState->freeze option to the FDW drivers
> today, though we may in the future when we add an *actual* COPY interface
> to FDWs. Wouldn't it be a good idea to prevent specifying the FREEZE
> option for foreign tables as COPY targets until then? Of course, that's
> something for -hackers to consider.
No idea if that will happen. One argument for doing nothing yet is that
this command does not fail now so changing it may cause compatibility
problems.
--
Michael